How *not* to design a website
Feb. 24th, 2003 07:42 pmOh dear. The BBC have 'improved' their news website, by destroying most of the best features. I used to love browsing around the BBC news site, which was quick, easy, and there was lots of cross links to different related stories on the right of the screen. This week they updated it - it's noticeably slower for a start. And the dozens of links that used to appear on the right have been cut down severely, making casual browsing next to impossible, and its difficult to find anything except the 'top' stories in each category.
no subject
Date: 2003-02-24 11:48 am (UTC)The same thing happened with the New Scientist site a while ago; the previous version was a lot more readable and accessible (and at the same time they changed that, they also stopped having some of their features articles online, and now only have news articles, which made it doubly annoying).
no subject
Date: 2003-02-24 12:03 pm (UTC)Maybe they should have one of their little polls on their website on 'Is the new site better or just a disaster?'. I know which I'd vote for. :)
no subject
Date: 2003-02-24 11:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-24 12:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-24 02:03 pm (UTC)Vast acres of useless white space, no information about any of the stories apart from the (often unrepresentative) headline, and just *blah*. It also looks a lot more like the CNN site (which I look at occasionally in a kind of 'different perspectives' type way), apart from being less usable.
And the default font is nearly invisible. :(
no subject
Date: 2003-02-24 02:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2003-02-25 08:04 am (UTC)*is not impressed*
You're right, it's way inferior to what it was like before.
Grrrrrrr. :(