Tube fares of doom!
Oct. 4th, 2005 08:32 pmTube fares next year
£3 minimum cash for a single tube ticket? *boggle*
Oyster card fares are going down. Cash fares are going into outer space. If you travel at all in London, *especially* if you’re just visiting for daytrips - get an Oyster card NOW.
£3 minimum cash for a single tube ticket? *boggle*
Oyster card fares are going down. Cash fares are going into outer space. If you travel at all in London, *especially* if you’re just visiting for daytrips - get an Oyster card NOW.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 09:18 pm (UTC)I think it's excessive; I would think the same if any city I lived in tried to make it expensive to usepublic transport for non-residents. Again; I think public transport is a public service, not a club for local people, and should be treated as such.
This is, of course, my opinion. You are not obliged to agree with me. I am endevouring to explain why your reply does not move me.
He also isn't elected by under 18s; should their needs therefore be ignored?
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 10:15 pm (UTC)London's public transport should actually serve all users well. When the majority of users are still commuters and residents, who will buy (or already have bought) into Oyster except for the people with paper rail/tube season tickets, and that's also all the people who vote for Ken, occasional visitors and tourists to London will get ignored or shafted.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 10:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-04 10:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 08:03 am (UTC)Personally, I almost always buy some form of travelcard or carnet when I travel to foreign cities, and from the look of the above, they're not rising anything like as much as single ticket fares.
no subject
Date: 2005-10-05 10:57 am (UTC)